Saturday, March 28, 2015
The missing candidate
The problem with voting is that it implicitly suggests that everyone will accept the result of the vote. But what if 51% of people were to vote for a law that said everyone had to punch a homeless person in the face? I couldn't accept it, even if the majority voted for it. The whim of the majority should not override the rights of the minority.
Sure, I could attempt to protest the system by just leaving the voting ballot blank or scribbling something on it. But the problem is that only the votes of those who actually voted one way or the other would be taken into account. What I really want is a way to vote against the system itself.
Random thought. What if there was an Anarchy party? I know this would seem self-contradictory, but it would not be your typical party. Such a party would block EVERY bill, both good and bad, essentially preventing the government from functioning. In the absence of government, citizens would be free to experiment with new forms of self-governance with the old system being powerless to stop them.
Thursday, March 26, 2015
How democracy brings out the worst
There's an interesting scene in The Dark Night where the Joker sets up a social experiment where one boat must blow up the other boat in order to live. The civilian boat decides to put it to a vote. But in-spite of a majority vote by the civilian boat to save themselves by blowing up the other boat first, no-one actually has the guts to follow through.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rr03gGto1Iw
I think this highlights a major flaw in democratic systems. The majority of citizen's seem comfortable voting for a government that puts asylum seekers in indefinite detention. But what if they actually had to do the dirty-work themselves? To explain to an innocent child why they are not welcome and must instead be locked behind bars until they are returned to a life of poverty. I don't think anyone (except maybe a few sociopaths) could do it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rr03gGto1Iw
I think this highlights a major flaw in democratic systems. The majority of citizen's seem comfortable voting for a government that puts asylum seekers in indefinite detention. But what if they actually had to do the dirty-work themselves? To explain to an innocent child why they are not welcome and must instead be locked behind bars until they are returned to a life of poverty. I don't think anyone (except maybe a few sociopaths) could do it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)